Skip to content
Menu
LandWISE – Promoting sustainable land management
  • Welcome to LandWISE Inc!
    • About
    • Contact
  • Projects
    • Carbon Positive
    • Soil Repair after Cyclone Gabrielle
    • Vegetable Production Nitrogen Management
    • Best Management of Nitrates in Process Cropping
    • Future Proofing Vegetable Production
    • Herbicide Resistance Management
  • Sign Up
  • Events
    • Getting to Carbon Positive!
      • Getting to Carbon Positive – Presenters
    • Rebuilding Our Soils
      • Rebuilding Our Soils – Presenters
  • Login
  • Members Only
    • Online Learning
    • Tools
      • Cyclone Gabrielle Grower Survey 2023
      • Fertiliser Spread Analysis & Calibration
      • Nutrient Budget
      • Irrigation Evaluation – IRRIG8
      • ANOVA Tool for statistical significance
  • Blog Archive
  • 2025 Annual General Meeting
LandWISE – Promoting sustainable land management

Cyclone Gabrielle response update

Posted on April 19, 2023
Site Icon
This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Sloppy-paddock-1024x292.jpg

We all know that many people in the Hawke’s Bay, Gisborne and Northland Regions were hit hard by Cyclone Gabrielle. For many it came on top of a very difficult spring and summer, and some have little left. Houses, sheds, machinery and crops were damaged or destroyed. Some blocks have metres of sediment deposited, others have been severely scoured. There is a huge job ahead and it is going to be years before we can say things are recovered.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Excavated-orchard-sediment-1024x1024.jpg
Deep sediment being removed from orchard rows

Our response was to help bring resources together and provide what advice we could on remediating impacted sites. When we put a call out for advice to share, we were quickly deluged with high quality information from crown research institutes, universities and industry. That is what underpins the advice note we put out to members and the wider community. We put information together at our page Soil Repair After Cyclone Gabrielle. The page also includes links to others’ websites and has downloadable information to help do a stock-take, make decisions, and prioritise actions.

For the last few weeks, we have been out in the field, assessing sediments and collecting samples for nutrient and in some cases contaminant assessment. We are grateful to Horticulture New Zealand, Vegetables New Zealand and the Ministry for Primary Industries for providing funding to collect samples and pay for lab testing.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is IMG_20230320_220257-1024x1024.jpg
Collecting samples isn’t always simple

We are also grateful to Massey University’s Farmed Landscapes Research Centre, AgResearch and Plant and Food Research for making soil science staff available to help at their own cost. The job became much larger than we had anticipated, and without these willing advisors and helpers, we would have been overwhelmed. Among the testing done is Visual Soil Assessment. Below are two examples; one from a paddock with less than 10 cm sediment, the other with almost 20 cm sediment deposited. Interestingly, even some severely affected sites still show reasonable work activity both in the soil below the sediment, and with channels through the dense sediment itself.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Good-VSA.jpg
~9 cm sediment – Reasonable VSA
> 20 cm sediment – Poor VSA

We have been sampling representative sites across most of the key affected areas in Hawke’s Bay, but still have a lot more to do. Along with Horticulture NZ, Gisborne District Council and Northland Regional Council, and our research partners, we are helping coordinate similar activities in the other affected regions. Information about those activities and results as they arrive will be put on the Gabrielle webpage.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is IMG_20230309_143508-1024x1024.jpg
Making site-specific plans

We have benefitted from work done after historic flood events, including in Gisborne in 1948, and in the Southern North Island in 2004. We hope to track some of our Cyclone Gabrielle sites over the next few months and years, so we know more about the effects of different management choices on paddocks with various types and depths of sediment.

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses User Verification plugin to reduce spam. See how your comment data is processed.
  • LandWISE Conference 2025
  • LandWISE 2025 AGM
  • Managing our footprint
  • Regenerative Cropping and Biological Factors
  • Electrification
  • Events of Interest
  • Carbon Positive Field Walk
  • Cover crops emerging
  • Quantofix vs MQuant Nitrate Test Strips
  • Notice of Special General Meeting
  • Green Beans and Carbon Positive
  • LandWISE/Te Ahikawariki Projects

RECENT POSTS

  • LandWISE Conference 2025
  • LandWISE 2025 AGM
  • Managing our footprint
  • Regenerative Cropping and Biological Factors
  • Electrification

CATEGORIES

  • Agritech
  • Asparagus
  • Conference
  • Courses
  • Cover crops
  • Cultivation
  • Events
  • Fresh Vegetables
  • Irrigation
  • Membership
  • Nitrate
  • Nutrition
  • People
  • Permanent crops
  • Pests
  • Process Crops
  • Projects
  • Protected cropping
  • regenerative agriculture
  • Regulations
  • Research
  • soil health
  • Sustainable technology
  • Uncategorized
  • Water resources
  • Weeds
©2023 LandWISE – Promoting sustainable land management

Disclaimer: Any information on the LandWISE website or linked LandWISE resources is of a general nature only. We endeavour to provide accurate and adequate information relating to the subject matters contained in it. It has been prepared and made available to all persons and entities strictly on the basis that LandWISE, its researchers and authors are fully excluded from any liability for damages arising out of any reliance in part or in full upon any of the information for any purpose. No endorsement of named products is intended nor is any criticism of other alternative, but unnamed product.