Skip to content
Menu
LandWISE – Promoting sustainable land management
  • Welcome
    • About
    • LandWISE Committee
    • Contact
  • Projects
    • Carbon Positive
      • Carbon Positive Reports
    • Nitrachek: Farmer Friendly Nitrate Testing
    • SLAKES: a cost-effective measure of soil structural stability
    • Soil Repair after Cyclone Gabrielle
    • Vegetable Production Nitrogen Management
    • Best Management of Nitrates in Process Cropping
    • Future Proofing Vegetable Production
    • Herbicide Resistance Management
  • Events
    • Cyclone Gabrielle Research Symposium
      • Historical North Island Flood Events
      • An extraordinary storm: the severity of Cyclone Gabrielle’s weather in Hawke’s Bay
      • The Science Response in the Year of Storms; A Gisborne/Tairawhiti perspective
      • Insights into causes of landslides triggered by Cyclone Gabrielle
      • The effects of Cyclone Gabrielle on fruit tree health in Hawke’s Bay
      • Impact of Cyclone Gabrielle on stonefruit orchards in Hawke’s Bay: a case study
      • Charting the Course following Cyclone Gabrielle
      • Baseline sediment sampling in Tairawhiti and Hawke’s Bay
      • Impacts on cropping businesses
      • Understanding the flooding caused by Cyclone Gabrielle
      • Building Flood Damage from Ex-Tropical Cyclone Gabrielle
      • Food safety and critical incidents: A unified approach for safer produce
      • Silt nutritional status and contamination concerns
      • Lessons from the horticultural sector response to Cyclone Gabrielle
      • Ecological impacts of Cyclone Gabrielle
      • Cyclone Gabrielle and Poplar Windthrow in Northland
      • Seed Size and Establishment Method Determine Crop Recovery Following Cyclone-Induced Silt Deposition
      • Returning to (some) baseline sampling sites to assess cropping soil recovery
      • Recovery of annual cropping ground – Grower learnings
      • Recovery of Annual Cropping over 2 Years
      • Technical and extension learnings from Cyclone Gabrielle
    • Getting to Carbon Positive!
      • Getting to Carbon Positive – Presenters
    • Rebuilding Our Soils
      • Rebuilding Our Soils – Presenters
    • Events Archive
  • Tools
    • Nitrachek Calculator
    • Carbon Calculator
    • Nutrient Budget
    • Irrigation Evaluation – IRRIG8
      • IRRIG8: Centre Pivot
        • IRRIG8-online: Centre Pivot User Guide
      • IRRIG8: Linear Move
      • IRRIG8: Travelling Irrigator
        • IRRIG8-online: Travelling Irrigation User Guide
      • IRRIG8: Multiple sprayline calculator
      • IRRIG8: Solid set irrigation
      • IRRIG8: Pressure and energy
        • Pressure and Energy Calculator: User Guide
    • ANOVA Tool for statistical significance
    • Fertspread Spreader Calibration
    • Fertspread Placement Calibration
    • Soil Infiltration Calculator
      • Disc Permeameter User Guide
      • Disc Permeameter Calculator: Frequently Asked Questions
  • Blog
  • Sign Up
  • Login
  • Members Only
    • Online Learning
  • Account
  • Site Search
LandWISE – Promoting sustainable land management

Disc Permeameter Calculator: Frequently Asked Questions

General Questions

What is a disc permeameter?

A disc permeameter (also called a tension infiltrometer) is a device that measures how water infiltrates into soil at controlled negative pressure (tension). Unlike ring infiltrometers that flood the soil surface, disc permeameters control which pore sizes water can flow through, giving you detailed information about soil structure.

Why would I use this instead of a simple ring infiltrometer?

Disc permeameters provide much more information:

  • Pore-size distribution: See how much flow occurs through cracks and large pores vs. fine matrix pores
  • Soil structure assessment: Detect compaction, poor structure, or excellent drainage capacity
  • Preferential flow: Identify bypass flow pathways
  • Multiple hydraulic properties: Get α, Ks, and macroporosity from multi-tension measurements

Ring infiltrometers only give you saturated flow – they can’t distinguish between structural pores and matrix flow.

What equipment do I need?

  • Disc permeameter with tension control system (mariotte or bubble tower)
  • Contact material (fine sand or glass beads, 0.1-0.5 mm)
  • Circular template matching disc diameter
  • Timer or stopwatch
  • Level
  • Data sheets and pencils
  • This calculator (on your tablet or computer)!

Before You Measure

When should I measure?

Best conditions:

  • Soil at or near field capacity (1-2 days after rain or irrigation)
  • Moderate temperatures (not extreme heat or cold)
  • During growing season if comparing year-to-year

Avoid:

  • Frozen or nearly frozen soil
  • Extremely dry soil (infiltration will be very slow)
  • Immediately after heavy rain (soil too wet)

How many locations should I measure?

  • Single field assessment: 3-5 representative spots
  • Comparing management treatments: 5-10 replicates per treatment
  • Spatial mapping: Grid sampling based on field size and variability

More measurements = more confidence in results, especially in variable soils.

Where exactly should I place the disc?

  • Avoid: obvious cracks, animal burrows, fresh disturbances, rocks, wheel tracks (unless specifically assessing compaction)
  • Choose: representative areas that reflect typical field conditions
  • For compaction assessment: deliberately measure both trafficked and non-trafficked areas to compare

Taking Measurements

What tensions should I use?

Standard three-tension protocol:

  • -15 cm: Measures pores > 0.2 mm (fine macropores and large mesopores)
  • -6 cm: Measures pores > 0.5 mm (medium macropores)
  • -3 cm: Measures pores > 1.0 mm (large macropores)

Measure in this order: -15 → -6 → -3 cm

For quick assessment: Use -6 cm (most common) or -3 cm (most conservative)

Note on pore sizes: Calculated using capillary equation: diameter (mm) ≈ 3 / tension (cm). Disc permeameters measure macropores and larger mesopores only. They cannot assess micropores (< 0.03 mm), which require tensions more negative than -100 cm.

How long does each measurement take?

Typically 30-60 minutes per tension to reach steady-state, but it varies:

  • Sandy soils: May reach steady-state in 20-30 minutes
  • Clay soils: May take 60-90 minutes
  • Very dry soils: Can take 2+ hours

Don’t rush! Steady-state is essential for accurate results.

How do I know when I’ve reached steady-state?

You’ve reached steady-state when:

  • Three consecutive readings show less than 5% variation in rate
  • The rate of water decline in the reservoir becomes constant
  • Typically occurs after the cumulative infiltration curve becomes linear

In the calculator: If your CV% is < 30%, you likely had good steady-state data.

What if my soil is really dry and infiltration is very slow?

Options:

  1. Pre-wet the soil: Apply water at -1 cm tension for 10-15 minutes, then proceed with your measurement tensions
  2. Use less negative tensions: Start with -3 cm instead of -15 cm
  3. Be patient: Accept that measurements will take longer
  4. Measure at better timing: Come back when soil is closer to field capacity

Can I measure on sloping ground?

Yes, but:

  • Level the measurement area as much as possible
  • Ensure the disc sits flat and level
  • Note the slope in your records
  • Be aware that results may be affected by gravity-driven lateral flow
  • Consider measuring on more level areas if slope is steep (> 10%)

Can disc permeameters measure micropores?

No. Disc permeameters have practical limits:

What they CAN measure:

  • Macropores and larger mesopores (pores > 0.2 mm)
  • Tensions from 0 to about -15 or -20 cm

What they CANNOT measure:

  • Micropores (< 0.03 mm)
  • Require tensions more negative than -100 cm
  • Extremely slow infiltration (hours to days)
  • Air entry problems at high tensions

For micropore assessment, use:

  • Pressure plate apparatus (up to -1500 kPa / -15 bar)
  • Water retention curves
  • Field capacity measurements
  • Laboratory methods (mercury intrusion, gas adsorption)

Understanding the limitation: Micropores hold plant-available water, while macropores provide drainage. Disc permeameters characterize drainage pores, not water-holding pores.


Using the Calculator

Do I enter all my measurements or just steady-state data?

Enter only steady-state measurements. Skip the early transient phase where infiltration is rapidly changing.

Look at your raw data – identify where the rate stabilizes, then enter those time points and their corresponding cumulative infiltration values.

What units should I use?

  • Time: minutes (from start of measurement)
  • Water level: cm (reading from reservoir scale)
  • Disc diameter: cm (measure across the disc)
  • Reservoir diameter: cm (measure inner diameter of tower)
  • Tension: cm (as negative value, e.g., -6)

The calculator automatically converts water level to cumulative infiltration and displays results in multiple units (cm/s, cm/hr, mm/hr).

What is “sorptivity parameter (b)” and what value should I use?

Sorptivity parameter accounts for capillary effects at the disc edge.

Use these values:

  • 0.55: Default for most soils (clay loam to loam)
  • 0.45-0.50: Sandy soils
  • 0.60-0.70: Heavy clay soils

Unless you have site-specific data, use 0.55 – it’s appropriate for most agricultural soils and the variation has minimal impact on results.

The calculator shows rates between my data points – what are those?

These are instantaneous infiltration rates calculated from consecutive measurements:

Rate = (Infiltration₂ – Infiltration₁) / (Time₂ – Time₁)

They help you visually confirm steady-state – these values should be relatively constant during the steady-state period.

Should I use single tension or multi-tension analysis?

Use single tension when:

  • You only measured at one tension
  • You want quick results for a specific pore-size range
  • You’re doing routine monitoring

Use multi-tension when:

  • You measured at 2-3 different tensions
  • You want to understand pore-size distribution
  • You’re characterizing soil structure in detail
  • You want to estimate saturated conductivity

Both are valuable – multi-tension gives more complete information but requires more field time.


Interpreting Results

What’s a “good” K(h) value?

It depends on your soil type and land use:

For agricultural soils:

  • 5-60 mm/hr: Generally adequate range
  • < 5 mm/hr: May indicate compaction or drainage problems
  • > 60 mm/hr: Very good drainage, but watch for nutrient leaching

Context matters! A clay soil with K = 8 mm/hr might be excellent, while sandy loam with the same value might indicate problems.

My K(h) is “Very Low” – is that bad?

Not necessarily. Consider:

Naturally low K:

  • Heavy clay soils naturally have low K
  • Subsoils typically have lower K than topsoil
  • Fine-textured soils without good structure

Problematic low K:

  • Compacted soil (especially if previously higher)
  • Traffic pans or plow pans
  • Surface sealing or crusting
  • Recent management causing structure degradation

Compare your result to:

  • Expected values for your soil texture
  • Previous measurements from same site
  • Non-compacted reference areas

What does CV% tell me and why does it matter?

CV (coefficient of variation) measures consistency:

CV < 20%: Excellent – your steady-state measurements were very stable
CV 20-30%: Good – acceptable variation, results are reliable
CV 30-50%: Fair – some instability, interpret with caution
CV > 50%: Poor – steady-state questionable or highly variable soil

High CV can mean:

  1. You didn’t wait long enough for steady-state
  2. Soil is naturally variable (macropores are heterogeneous)
  3. Measurement problems (air locks, poor contact)

What is macroporosity and why should I care?

Macroporosity shows what percentage of flow occurs through large structural pores (cracks, root channels, worm burrows) versus fine-textured matrix pores.

Why it matters:

High macroporosity (> 50%):

  • ✓ Excellent structure and drainage
  • ✓ Good root penetration
  • ⚠️ Potential for preferential flow (bypass of nutrients/pesticides)
  • ⚠️ Rapid pesticide/nutrient movement

Low macroporosity (< 20%):

  • ⚠️ May indicate compaction
  • ⚠️ Limited large pore pathways
  • ⚠️ Restricted drainage
  • ✓ Better filtration of water

Moderate (20-50%): Ideal balance for most purposes

What does α (alpha) tell me?

Alpha describes pore-size distribution:

  • Large α (> 0.1): Soil has uniform, similar-sized pores – common in compacted or structureless soils
  • Small α (< 0.05): Wide range of pore sizes from very fine to very large – indicates good structure
  • Medium α (0.05-0.1): Normal distribution for agricultural soils

Think of α as a “structure quality” indicator – smaller values generally indicate better structure.

The R² for my Gardner model is only 0.78 – what does that mean?

R² measures how well the Gardner exponential model fits your data:

R² < 0.85 suggests:

  • Your soil doesn’t follow the simple Gardner model
  • Possible bimodal pore distribution (two distinct pore populations)
  • Potential measurement errors at one tension
  • Complex soil structure

What to do:

  • Review your individual tension measurements for quality
  • Use the single-tension results rather than relying on the Gardner fit
  • Note that not all soils follow simple models – this is okay!

My K values increased from -15 to -3 cm. What went wrong?

K(h) should decrease or stay similar as tension becomes less negative. If it increases:

Check these:

  1. Did you achieve steady-state at each tension?
  2. Did you measure in the correct order (-15 → -6 → -3)?
  3. Could the disc have moved between measurements?
  4. Could swelling clays be blocking smaller pores?

Most commonly, this indicates the more negative tension didn’t fully reach steady-state. Review those measurements carefully.


Specific Applications

How do I use this to assess compaction?

Compare measurements from:

  • Wheel tracks vs. inter-row areas
  • Surface (0-5 cm) vs. subsurface (10-20 cm)
  • Before and after traffic events

Compaction indicators:

  • K(h) < 5 mm/hr (especially if previously higher)
  • Macroporosity < 20%
  • Large decrease in K compared to non-trafficked areas

Can this help me design drainage systems?

Yes! K(h) data is essential for drainage design:

  • Use K at -3 cm (conservative, represents matrix flow)
  • Or use Ks from Gardner model for maximum drainage conditions
  • Lower K values = need closer drain spacing
  • High variability in K = need more flexible design

Note: Consult a drainage specialist for actual system design.

How do I use results for irrigation management?

Application rate guideline: Keep irrigation rates below K(h) at field tension (typically -3 to -6 cm) to prevent:

  • Surface ponding
  • Runoff
  • Surface sealing

Example:

  • K at -3 cm = 15 mm/hr
  • Keep sprinkler application rate < 15 mm/hr

Can I compare measurements from different seasons?

Yes, but note that K(h) varies seasonally:

Higher K in:

  • Late spring/summer (biological activity peak)
  • After freeze-thaw cycles (structure development)
  • During active root growth

Lower K in:

  • Winter (reduced biological activity)
  • After heavy rainfall (some structure breakdown)
  • During/after cultivation

Best practice: Measure at same time of year for year-to-year comparisons.


Troubleshooting Problems

My infiltration is extremely slow (< 0.1 cm in 30 minutes)

Possible causes:

  • Soil is very dry (wetting front advancing slowly)
  • Severe compaction or clay pan
  • Air lock in system
  • Membrane clogged
  • Poor contact between disc and soil

Solutions:

  • Pre-wet the soil with -1 cm tension
  • Check system for air bubbles
  • Verify membrane is clean and functioning
  • Improve contact layer quality

Water is pooling around the edge of the disc

Causes:

  • Positive pressure head (check tension setting)
  • Surface not level
  • Contact layer too uneven
  • Soil has preferential flow pathway just outside disc

Solutions:

  • Verify tension control is working
  • Re-level the surface and disc
  • Remake contact layer more carefully
  • Consider relocating measurement

My readings are erratic – they jump up and down

Likely causes:

  • Air entering/leaving system
  • Temperature fluctuations affecting water volume
  • Macropore intercepted (worm hole, crack) causing intermittent flow
  • Reading water level incorrectly

Solutions:

  • Check for air leaks in system
  • Shade reservoir from direct sun
  • For macropore: note it, consider relocating, or just report high variability
  • Take more careful readings

The contact material keeps washing away

Causes:

  • Applying too much water initially
  • Setting tension too close to zero
  • Layer too thick
  • Material too coarse

Solutions:

  • Start with a more negative tension
  • Use thinner layer (2-3 mm maximum)
  • Use finer material (0.1-0.3 mm)
  • Apply initial water very slowly

Data Quality and Confidence

How many measurements do I really need per site?

Absolute minimum: 3 steady-state points per tension
Recommended: 5-8 points per tension
Better: 10+ points per tension

More points = lower CV = more reliable average rate calculation.

Should I throw out outlier measurements?

Be cautious about discarding data!

Consider removing if:

  • Clear measurement error (misread scale, recording mistake)
  • Equipment malfunction at that point
  • Obvious disturbance (accidentally bumped equipment)

Keep if:

  • Just seems “different” but no clear error
  • Soil variability could explain it
  • Part of steady-state period even if slightly off trend

When in doubt, include it and let the CV tell you about data variability.

My two replicate measurements at the same site differ by 50%. Is that normal?

It can be, especially for:

  • Macropore flow: Highly variable by nature
  • Structured soils: Spatial variability is real
  • Stratified soils: Small differences in depth sampled = big K differences

What to do:

  • Report mean and range of replicate measurements
  • Take more replicates if possible
  • Note high spatial variability in interpretation
  • Consider if sampling strategy needs adjustment

Advanced Questions

Can I use this method on rocky soils?

Challenging but possible:

  • Choose locations between rocks
  • Use small stones to level around larger rocks
  • Accept that results represent the fine fraction between rocks
  • Consider that bulk soil K may be higher due to rock voids
  • Take extra replicates due to high variability

What about cracking clay soils?

Interesting case:

  • Cracks dominate flow when open (very high K, high macroporosity)
  • Matrix dominates when cracks swell closed (low K)
  • Timing matters – measure when you want to understand flow conditions
  • Multi-tension analysis shows dramatic difference between tensions
  • Results highly dependent on moisture content

Can I convert K(h) to saturated K?

From single tension: No reliable conversion – too many assumptions required

From multi-tension Gardner model: Yes! The calculator extrapolates to estimate Ks

Caution: Extrapolated Ks is an estimate. For true saturated K, measure at zero or positive head.

How do seasonal changes in biology affect results?

Significantly:

  • Earthworm activity creates macropores → higher K, higher macroporosity
  • Root growth creates channels → higher K
  • Freeze-thaw cycles improve structure → higher K
  • Tillage disrupts structure → temporarily changes K

This is why timing measurements consistently is important for monitoring.


Getting Help

When should I consult a professional?

Consider getting expert help if:

  • Results consistently contradict field observations
  • Designing major infrastructure (drainage, irrigation systems)
  • Making significant management investments based on data
  • Measurements show concerning trends you don’t understand
  • You’re working with unusual or problem soils
  • Legal or regulatory requirements involved

Where can I learn more?

Scientific literature:

  • Search for “tension infiltrometer” or “disc permeameter” in Soil Science Society of America Journal
  • Look for Reynolds, Elrick, Wooding, and Perroux in author searches

Extension resources:

  • USDA-NRCS Soil Quality resources
  • State university extension soil science pages
  • FAO soil management guides

Equipment manufacturers:

  • Often provide detailed instruction manuals
  • May offer training courses or videos

Final Tips

✓ Quality over quantity – one good steady-state measurement beats five poor ones

✓ Document everything – photos, conditions, anomalies help interpret results later

✓ Be patient – rushing to steady-state gives unreliable results

✓ Context is king – numbers mean nothing without site knowledge

✓ Track changes – baseline measurements enable monitoring improvement over time

✓ When in doubt, measure again – if results seem questionable, a repeat measurement gives clarity


Still have questions? The comprehensive guide provides detailed methodology and interpretation. The calculator’s “About” tab includes scientific references and background information.

  • Cyclone Gabrielle Research Symposium
  • Biodiversity Strips Update
  • Carbon Positive: Butternuts
  • Carbon Positive: Butternut Planting to Side Dressing
  • Nitrate Levels on the MicroFarm
  • Cyclone Gabrielle Research Symposium
  • Introducing Carys Luke, our Summer Intern
  • Soil Infiltration Calculator
  • MicroFarm Biodiversity Update
  • Irrigation System Testing
  • Carbon Positive: Butternut Planting
  • NZARM Conference 2025

RECENT POSTS

  • Cyclone Gabrielle Research Symposium
  • Biodiversity Strips Update
  • Carbon Positive: Butternuts
  • Carbon Positive: Butternut Planting to Side Dressing
  • Nitrate Levels on the MicroFarm

CATEGORIES

  • Agritech
  • Asparagus
  • Conference
  • Courses
  • Cover crops
  • Cultivation
  • Events
  • Fresh Vegetables
  • Irrigation
  • Membership
  • Nitrate
  • Nutrition
  • People
  • Permanent crops
  • Pests
  • Process Crops
  • Projects
  • Protected cropping
  • regenerative agriculture
  • Regulations
  • Research
  • soil health
  • Sustainable technology
  • Uncategorized
  • Water resources
  • Weeds
©2023 LandWISE – Promoting sustainable land management

Disclaimer: Any information on the LandWISE website or linked LandWISE resources is of a general nature only. We endeavour to provide accurate and adequate information relating to the subject matters contained in it. It has been prepared and made available to all persons and entities strictly on the basis that LandWISE, its researchers and authors are fully excluded from any liability for damages arising out of any reliance in part or in full upon any of the information for any purpose. No endorsement of named products is intended nor is any criticism of other alternative, but unnamed product.