Skip to content
Menu
LandWISE – Promoting sustainable land management
  • Welcome
    • About
    • LandWISE Committee and Staff
    • Contact
  • Projects
    • Carbon Positive
      • Carbon Positive Reports
    • Nitrachek: Farmer Friendly Nitrate Testing
    • SLAKES: a cost-effective measure of soil structural stability
    • Soil Repair after Cyclone Gabrielle
    • Vegetable Production Nitrogen Management
    • Best Management of Nitrates in Process Cropping
    • Future Proofing Vegetable Production
    • Herbicide Resistance Management
  • Events
    • Soil Health for Profit
      • Soil Health for Profit Presenters
        • What makes a farm “regenerative”?
        • Soil and Plant Nutrition at Harvest Moon
        • Regenerative agriculture principles in Kiwifruit production
        • Carbon Positive: Applying Regenerative Principles to Intensive Process Vegetable Production 2025-2026
        • Carbon Positive: making sense of carbon data
        • A Career in Cropping ? building soil
        • Cyclone Gabrielle Research Symposium: Lessons for the management of highly productive land
        • Cyclone Recovery: Turning sediment to soil
        • Cascading impacts of Cyclone Gabrielle ? and why soil health is business resilience
        • Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Cover Crop and Soil Health Research and Extension
        • Technologies at Harvest Moon
        • Do all nitrogenamendmentshave the same footprint?
        • Answers Under Foot: Should Soil Health Be Our #1 Sustainability Goal?
        • Going way back: LandWISE?s History of Minimum Tillage
        • Crop Stacking: The best practice of tomorrow
        • Long-term evaluation of tillage systems for maize silage in New Zealand
        • Minimising Tillage at Ludlow Farms
        • Long-Term Maize Establishment andCover Crop Research in the Waikato
        • Minimum tillage discussion panel
    • Cyclone Gabrielle Research Symposium
    • Getting to Carbon Positive!
      • Getting to Carbon Positive – Presenters
    • Rebuilding Our Soils
      • Rebuilding Our Soils – Presenters
    • Events Archive
  • Tools
    • Fertiliser Application Equipment Calibration
      • Fertspread Spreader Calibration
      • Fertspread Placement Calibration
    • Nitrachek Calculator
    • Irrigation Evaluation – IRRIG8
      • IRRIG8: Centre Pivot Calibration
      • IRRIG8: Solid Set Calibration
      • IRRIG8: Sprayline calibration
      • IRRIG8: Centre Pivot Evaluation
      • IRRIG8: Linear Move Calibration
      • IRRIG8: Linear Move Evaluation
      • IRRIG8: Travelling Irrigator Calibration
      • IRRIG8: Travelling Irrigation Evaluation
      • IRRIG8: Drip Micro Calibration
      • IRRIG8: Sprayline Evaluation
      • IRRIG8: Drip Micro Evaluation
      • IRRIG8: Solid set irrigation evaluation
      • IRRIG8: Pressure and energy
        • Pressure and Energy Calculator: User Guide
    • Soil Infiltration Calculator
      • Disc Permeameter User Guide
      • Disc Permeameter Calculator: Frequently Asked Questions
    • Carbon Calculator
    • ANOVA Tool for statistical significance
  • Blog
  • Sign Up
  • Login
  • Members Only
    • Online Learning
  • Account
  • Site Search
LandWISE – Promoting sustainable land management

IRRIG8: Pressure and energy

This calibration tool is designed to meet the IrrigationNZ: NZ Irrigation System Performance Assessment Code of Practice – Part I: Conducting Energy Efficiency Assessments and Seasonal Irrigation Efficiency. Download the code for more guidance.

NOTE: IRRIG8 does not store your data or keep any records. Leaving or refreshing this page will delete all your data, so print reports and export the data or graphs if you want to save them. To have a copy you can reload and edit, download the Save Session csv file and save it. This tool lets you upload it again to automatically repopulate all your data.

Beta version: See disclaimer at foot of page

⚡ Pump & Delivery Energy Assessment v1.0.0

Pump efficiency and delivery system efficiency following the IrrigationNZ Code of Practice Part I, Section 1

💾 Save or Reload an Assessment

Save everything entered on all tabs, plus the results, to a CSV file on your computer. Load it later to fill the tool back in and recalculate.

Files stay on your computer; nothing is uploaded to the website. Loading replaces what is currently entered.
🏡 Farm & Property Information
🖼️ Report Branding (Optional)
JPG, PNG or GIF, max 500KB
Logo preview
⚡ Pump and Power Unit
Code Table 1.1: submersibles under 55 kW run 3–5% higher, turbines 5–10% higher
Nameplate rating; sets the typical efficiency range
Time between the meter readings (same period for power and water)
Energy Used During the Test
Usually 1; check the meter or the power company
Measure by refilling to the same mark
Leave blank for the Code value: diesel 3.75 (3.5–4.0), petrol 2.65 (2.5–2.8)
Use instead of meter readings, e.g. from a power analyser
From the motor nameplate; gives an estimate of pump-only efficiency
Leave blank to use the middle of the Code Table 1.1 range
💲 Running Costs (Optional)
💧 Water Flow During the Test
Use instead of meter readings, e.g. from an irrigation calibration
⛰️ Elevations (m)

Any common datum (e.g. metres above sea level, or relative to the pump). Work to 0.1 m (about 1 kPa). Water surface is the level while pumping, including drawdown.

📏 Pressures
0 when drawing from open water; positive for a pressurised supply
Suction (vacuum) as a negative value. Optional, but needed for intake losses
After filters, meter and valves
At the irrigator or block entry
🎯 Design & Requirements (Optional)
From the design details
What the irrigator or block needs (end nozzle/emitter requirement plus losses)
🔧 Intake and Mainline

Use internal diameters: measure them or confirm with the supplier. Nominal size is often not the internal diameter, and small diameter errors give large velocity errors.

Between the entry and exit gauges
Hazen–Williams C for the expected friction (a check, not part of the Code method)
Sets the Code maximum mainline velocity

What is calculated

  • Total dynamic head, work done and overall pump efficiency, compared with typical values for the motor size
  • Energy per cubic metre and per hectare-millimetre, and running costs if prices are entered
  • Intake, headworks and mainline friction losses against the Code limits, and the energy they waste
  • Pipe velocities against the Code limits, and where the energy goes
📋 Report

Developed for LandWISE by Dan Bloomer, Page Bloomer Associates

  • Electrify Hawke’s Bay EXPO
  • Carbon Positive Update
  • 2026 Winter Cover Crops
  • 2026 – Food Quality Maize
  • Soil Health for Profit – James Hunter
  • Soil Health for Profit – Charlie White
  • Soil Health for Profit – Josh Wing
  • Soil Health for Profit – Pranoy Pal
  • Soil Health for Profit – Olivia Webster
  • Soil Health for Profit – Dan Bloomer
  • Soil Health for Profit – John Evans
  • Soil Health for Profit – Bill Ritchie

RECENT POSTS

  • Electrify Hawke’s Bay EXPO
  • Carbon Positive Update
  • 2026 Winter Cover Crops
  • 2026 – Food Quality Maize
  • Soil Health for Profit – James Hunter

CATEGORIES

  • Agritech
  • Arable crops
  • Asparagus
  • Conference
  • Courses
  • Cover crops
  • Crop protection
  • Cultivation
  • Events
  • Fresh Vegetables
  • Irrigation
  • Membership
  • Nitrate
  • Nutrition
  • People
  • Permanent crops
  • Pests
  • Process Crops
  • Projects
  • Protected cropping
  • regenerative agriculture
  • Regulations
  • Research
  • soil health
  • Sustainable technology
  • Uncategorized
  • Water resources
  • Weeds
©2023 LandWISE – Promoting sustainable land management

Disclaimer: Any information on the LandWISE website or linked LandWISE resources is of a general nature only. We endeavour to provide accurate and adequate information relating to the subject matters contained in it. It has been prepared and made available to all persons and entities strictly on the basis that LandWISE, its researchers and authors are fully excluded from any liability for damages arising out of any reliance in part or in full upon any of the information for any purpose. No endorsement of named products is intended nor is any criticism of other alternative, but unnamed product.