Skip to content
Menu
LandWISE – Promoting sustainable land management
  • Welcome
    • About
    • LandWISE Committee
    • Contact
  • Projects
    • Carbon Positive
      • Carbon Positive Reports
    • Nitrachek: Farmer Friendly Nitrate Testing
    • SLAKES: a cost-effective measure of soil structural stability
    • Soil Repair after Cyclone Gabrielle
    • Vegetable Production Nitrogen Management
    • Best Management of Nitrates in Process Cropping
    • Future Proofing Vegetable Production
    • Herbicide Resistance Management
  • Events
    • Cyclone Gabrielle Research Symposium
      • Historical North Island Flood Events
      • An extraordinary storm: the severity of Cyclone Gabrielle’s weather in Hawke’s Bay
      • The Science Response in the Year of Storms; A Gisborne/Tairawhiti perspective
      • Insights into causes of landslides triggered by Cyclone Gabrielle
      • The effects of Cyclone Gabrielle on fruit tree health in Hawke’s Bay
      • Impact of Cyclone Gabrielle on stonefruit orchards in Hawke’s Bay: a case study
      • Charting the Course following Cyclone Gabrielle
      • Baseline sediment sampling in Tairawhiti and Hawke’s Bay
      • Impacts on cropping businesses
      • Understanding the flooding caused by Cyclone Gabrielle
      • Building Flood Damage from Ex-Tropical Cyclone Gabrielle
      • Food safety and critical incidents: A unified approach for safer produce
      • Silt nutritional status and contamination concerns
      • Lessons from the horticultural sector response to Cyclone Gabrielle
      • Ecological impacts of Cyclone Gabrielle
      • Cyclone Gabrielle and Poplar Windthrow in Northland
      • Seed Size and Establishment Method Determine Crop Recovery Following Cyclone-Induced Silt Deposition
      • Returning to (some) baseline sampling sites to assess cropping soil recovery
      • Recovery of annual cropping ground – Grower learnings
      • Recovery of Annual Cropping over 2 Years
      • Technical and extension learnings from Cyclone Gabrielle
    • Getting to Carbon Positive!
      • Getting to Carbon Positive – Presenters
    • Rebuilding Our Soils
      • Rebuilding Our Soils – Presenters
    • Events Archive
  • Tools
    • Nitrachek Calculator
    • Carbon Calculator
    • Nutrient Budget
    • Irrigation Evaluation – IRRIG8
      • IRRIG8: Centre Pivot
        • IRRIG8-online: Centre Pivot User Guide
      • IRRIG8: Linear Move
      • IRRIG8: Travelling Irrigator
        • IRRIG8-online: Travelling Irrigation User Guide
      • IRRIG8: Multiple sprayline calculator
      • IRRIG8: Solid set irrigation
      • IRRIG8: Pressure and energy
        • Pressure and Energy Calculator: User Guide
    • ANOVA Tool for statistical significance
    • Fertspread Spreader Calibration
    • Fertspread Placement Calibration
    • Soil Infiltration Calculator
      • Disc Permeameter User Guide
      • Disc Permeameter Calculator: Frequently Asked Questions
  • Blog
  • Sign Up
  • Login
  • Members Only
    • Online Learning
  • Account
  • Site Search
LandWISE – Promoting sustainable land management

IRRIG8: Multiple sprayline calculator

IRRIG8 does not store your data or keep any records. Leaving or refreshing this page will delete all your data, so print reports and export the data or graphs if you want to save them.

Beta version: See disclaimer at foot of page

🚿 Multiple Sprayline Irrigation System Calculator v1.2.0

Code of Practice Section 4.4 Compliant - Multiple Sprayline Irrigation Systems

Grid DU + Pressure DU + Sprinkler Performance Analysis

🏡 Farm & Property Information
👨‍🔬 Consultant & Evaluation Details
🏗 Multiple Sprayline System Configuration
💧 Sprinkler/Emitter Configuration
Affects maximum collector spacing limits
Manufacturer, model, and nozzle size
Distance between sprinklers on each sprayline
Full wetted diameter of sprinkler pattern (Section 4.4.13.1)
System design target pressure
Equation 22: q = Kd × p^x (can be determined from sprinkler test)
From manufacturer data or field determination (Section 4.4.13.3)
📏 Sprayline Configuration
Section 4.4: Multiple sprayline systems (3-20 spraylines)
Distance between parallel spraylines
Physical length of each sprayline
Sprayline Length + (0.75 × Wetted Diameter)
Effective Sprayline Length × Sprayline Spacing × Total Spraylines ÷ 10,000
🌱 Soil Information
Soil texture classification affecting infiltration and ponding
Basic infiltration rate of soil (typical range: 1-100 mm/hr)
Accounts for surface water pooling effects. Typical values: 1.0 (no ponding), 0.9-0.95 (minor ponding), 0.85-0.90 (moderate ponding). Observed during field operation.
🔬 Section 4.4.13 Sprinkler Performance Testing

Testing Requirements (Section 4.4.13.2)

  • Test at least 4 adjacent sprinklers near middle of a single sprayline
  • Avoid inlet end where pressure variation is typically too great
  • Ensure all sprinklers tested are of same specifications
  • Capture all flow without flooding nozzle or affecting pressure
  • Use container of at least 5 litres and measure time accurately
Section 4.4.13.2 requires minimum 4 adjacent sprinklers
Or Upload CSV Data

Format: Sprinkler ID, Position (m), Pressure (kPa), Volume (mL), Time (s), Flow (L/hr)

Select number of sprinklers and click "Generate Input Fields" to begin
⚖️ Section 4.4.13.3 Adjusted Pressure Test

Adjusted Pressure Requirements

Repeat measurements after adjusting pressure by about 20% to determine discharge coefficient:

  • If normal pressure 50-80 kPa: try to increase pressure
  • If normal pressure 100-140 kPa: reduce pressure
  • Use same sprinklers and measurement technique
  • Reset system to normal conditions after test
Complete normal pressure test first

Sprinkler Performance Results

📐 Section 4.4 Collector Placement Setup

Code Requirements (Section 4.4.13.5)

  • Maximum spacing: 3m for sprayers, 5.0m for impact sprinklers/rotators
  • Collector column spacing (Scc) must be a factor of sprayline spacing (Ds)
  • Collector row spacing (Scr) must be a factor of sprayline spacing (Dsr)
  • Grid test between three adjacent sprinklers
Section 4.4.13.4: Test between adjacent sprinklers
Valid options based on sprayline spacing and sprinkler type
Number of collectors positioned left of sprayline center
Number of collectors positioned right of sprayline center
Configure system first
💧 Grid Distribution Uniformity Test

Section 4.4 Grid Test Methodology

Grid uniformity test arranged between three adjacent sprinklers in representative part of system. Grid centered on sprayline, extending just beyond wetted width.

⚙️ Test Parameters
Total irrigation test time
Diameter of collectors used for Grid DU test and depth calculations
🌡️ Evaporation Test (Control Collector)
Initial volume in control collector at start of test
Final volume in control collector at end of test
Diameter of control collector used for evaporation measurement
Automatically calculated from control collector data above
📊 Data Collection Method

📄 Upload Grid DU Data from CSV

Format: Transect ID, Distance along transect (m), Volume (mL), Collection Time (min)

✏️ Manual Grid Data Entry

Grid input fields are auto-generated based on your collector setup configuration.

Configure collector setup to auto-generate grid input fields
Upload CSV data or manually enter collector measurements
🧮 Calculate Grid Distribution Uniformity

Grid DU Results

🔧 Pressure Distribution Uniformity Analysis

Pressure-Flow Relationship (Equation 22)

q = Kd × p^x where q is flow, Kd is discharge coefficient, p is pressure, x is exponent

📄 Upload Pressure Data from CSV

Format: Lateral ID, Distance along lateral (m), Pressure (kPa)

✏️ Manual Pressure Data Entry

3 measurements per sprayline: inlet, middle, and outlet pressure
Enter number of spraylines (2-10). Total pressure points = spraylines × 3
Select number of pressure points and click "Generate Input Fields" to begin manual entry

Pressure DU Results

📊 Multiple Sprayline System Performance Results
Field Distribution Uniformity (Section 4.4.16.1)
0.000
FDU = GDU × QDU × F_ponding

📏 Grid Distribution Uniformity (GDU)

🔧 Pressure Distribution Uniformity (QDU)

📊 Combined Analysis

Section 4.4 Multiple Sprayline Analysis

Complete all tests to see comprehensive field performance results.

  • Sprinkler Performance: Discharge coefficient and pressure-flow relationship
  • Grid DU: Distribution pattern uniformity from collector test
  • Pressure DU: Flow uniformity from pressure variations
  • Field DU: Combined performance using simple multiplication
📋 Section 4.4 Compliant Report Generation

  • Cyclone Gabrielle Research Symposium
  • Biodiversity Strips Update
  • Carbon Positive: Butternuts
  • Carbon Positive: Butternut Planting to Side Dressing
  • Nitrate Levels on the MicroFarm
  • Cyclone Gabrielle Research Symposium
  • Introducing Carys Luke, our Summer Intern
  • Soil Infiltration Calculator
  • MicroFarm Biodiversity Update
  • Irrigation System Testing
  • Carbon Positive: Butternut Planting
  • NZARM Conference 2025

RECENT POSTS

  • Cyclone Gabrielle Research Symposium
  • Biodiversity Strips Update
  • Carbon Positive: Butternuts
  • Carbon Positive: Butternut Planting to Side Dressing
  • Nitrate Levels on the MicroFarm

CATEGORIES

  • Agritech
  • Asparagus
  • Conference
  • Courses
  • Cover crops
  • Cultivation
  • Events
  • Fresh Vegetables
  • Irrigation
  • Membership
  • Nitrate
  • Nutrition
  • People
  • Permanent crops
  • Pests
  • Process Crops
  • Projects
  • Protected cropping
  • regenerative agriculture
  • Regulations
  • Research
  • soil health
  • Sustainable technology
  • Uncategorized
  • Water resources
  • Weeds
©2023 LandWISE – Promoting sustainable land management

Disclaimer: Any information on the LandWISE website or linked LandWISE resources is of a general nature only. We endeavour to provide accurate and adequate information relating to the subject matters contained in it. It has been prepared and made available to all persons and entities strictly on the basis that LandWISE, its researchers and authors are fully excluded from any liability for damages arising out of any reliance in part or in full upon any of the information for any purpose. No endorsement of named products is intended nor is any criticism of other alternative, but unnamed product.