Skip to content
Menu
LandWISE – Promoting sustainable land management
  • Welcome
    • About
    • LandWISE Committee and Staff
    • Contact
  • Projects
    • Carbon Positive
      • Carbon Positive Reports
    • Nitrachek: Farmer Friendly Nitrate Testing
    • SLAKES: a cost-effective measure of soil structural stability
    • Soil Repair after Cyclone Gabrielle
    • Vegetable Production Nitrogen Management
    • Best Management of Nitrates in Process Cropping
    • Future Proofing Vegetable Production
    • Herbicide Resistance Management
  • Events
    • Soil Health for Profit
      • Soil Health for Profit Presenters
        • What makes a farm “regenerative”?
        • Soil and Plant Nutrition at Harvest Moon
        • Regenerative agriculture principles in Kiwifruit production
        • Carbon Positive: Applying Regenerative Principles to Intensive Process Vegetable Production 2025-2026
        • Carbon Positive: making sense of carbon data
        • A Career in Cropping ? building soil
        • Cyclone Gabrielle Research Symposium: Lessons for the management of highly productive land
        • Cyclone Recovery: Turning sediment to soil
        • Cascading impacts of Cyclone Gabrielle ? and why soil health is business resilience
        • Lessons Learned from 20 Years of Cover Crop and Soil Health Research and Extension
        • Technologies at Harvest Moon
        • Do all nitrogenamendmentshave the same footprint?
        • Answers Under Foot: Should Soil Health Be Our #1 Sustainability Goal?
        • Going way back: LandWISE?s History of Minimum Tillage
        • Crop Stacking: The best practice of tomorrow
        • Long-term evaluation of tillage systems for maize silage in New Zealand
        • Minimising Tillage at Ludlow Farms
        • Long-Term Maize Establishment andCover Crop Research in the Waikato
        • Minimum tillage discussion panel
    • Cyclone Gabrielle Research Symposium
    • Getting to Carbon Positive!
      • Getting to Carbon Positive – Presenters
    • Rebuilding Our Soils
      • Rebuilding Our Soils – Presenters
    • Events Archive
  • Tools
    • Fertiliser Application Equipment Calibration
      • Fertspread Spreader Calibration
      • Fertspread Placement Calibration
    • Nitrachek Calculator
    • Irrigation Evaluation – IRRIG8
      • IRRIG8: Centre Pivot Calibration
      • IRRIG8: Solid Set Calibration
      • IRRIG8: Sprayline calibration
      • IRRIG8: Centre Pivot Evaluation
      • IRRIG8: Linear Move Calibration
      • IRRIG8: Linear Move Evaluation
      • IRRIG8: Travelling Irrigator Calibration
      • IRRIG8: Travelling Irrigation Evaluation
      • IRRIG8: Drip Micro Calibration
      • IRRIG8: Sprayline Evaluation
      • IRRIG8: Drip Micro Evaluation
      • IRRIG8: Solid set irrigation evaluation
      • IRRIG8: Pressure and energy
        • Pressure and Energy Calculator: User Guide
    • Soil Infiltration Calculator
      • Disc Permeameter User Guide
      • Disc Permeameter Calculator: Frequently Asked Questions
    • Carbon Calculator
    • ANOVA Tool for statistical significance
  • Blog
  • Sign Up
  • Login
  • Members Only
    • Online Learning
  • Account
  • Site Search
LandWISE – Promoting sustainable land management

Nitrate Levels on the MicroFarm

Posted on December 18, 2025

Throughout the Carbon Positive Trial, Soil Nitrate levels down to 30cm have been monitored fortnightly.  

During the tomato crop (26/10/2023 – 6/3/2024), the Regenerative treatment had significantly lower nitrate levels than the Conventional and Hybrid treatments, despite all three receiving similar amounts of nitrogen. This lower nitrate level was likely due to the breakdown of the cover crop. Approximately 12 t/ha of cover crop, mainly oats, was incorporated into the soil two days before planting, which would have tied up nitrogen.

Since then, different amounts of nitrogen have been applied across treatments, and there has been no significant difference in soil nitrate levels, except during the period when the Conventional and Hybrid treatments were in peas, while the Regenerative treatment remained in cover crop.

Amount of Nitrogen applied during each crop, by treatment.

TreatmentTomato Applied N kg/haBean Applied N kg/haButternut Applied N kg/ha  
Conventional89.460.876
Hybrid83.647.366
Regen88.528.918

Butternuts

Our pre-season soil tests showed that there was 110 kg of potentially available nitrogen in the Conventional, 93. 3 in the Hybrid and 97.3 in the Regenerative treatment.

Two days before the butternuts were planted, there were 32 kg Nitrate-N/ha in the Conventional, 39 in the Hybrid, and 46 in the Regenerative treatment.

At planting, the Conventional and Hybrid treatments received 300 kg of Complex, whereas the Regenerative treatment received 150 kg of Complex. This increased the kg of Nitrate-N in the Conventional to 80, the Hybrid to 71, and the Regenerative to 63.

At side dressing, the Conventional treatment got 150 kg/ha of CAN. The Hybrid got 113 kg/ha of CAN and a foliar application of seaweed. The Regenerative treatment got a foliar application of seaweed, Megafol, and fulvic acid.

When testing for nitrate after side dressing, we avoided the area where the fertiliser was applied. The nitrate test showed similar results to last time. There is 74 Kg of Nitrate-N in the Conventional, 73 in the Hybrid and 65 in the Regenerative treatment. We can assume the conventional is 18 kg higher and the Hybrid is 13.6 kg higher, as this is how much nitrogen was applied at side dressing.

Hybrid Butternuts
Regenerative Butternuts
Conventional Butternuts

Our aim is to push the limits of regenerative cropping to understand how much nitrogen input can be reduced. Based on potentially available nitrogen and fortnightly soil nitrate results, the Operations Advisory Group decided not to apply granular fertiliser to the Regenerative treatment at side-dressing.

A similar approach was taken last season in beans, where no granular fertiliser was applied at side-dressing and a foliar approach was used instead. Soil nitrate levels remained similar across all treatments, and the Regenerative treatment produced the highest bean yield.

We will continue to monitor nitrate levels fortnightly, and we will do leaf testing during fruit set.

Related

  • Electrify Hawke’s Bay EXPO
  • Carbon Positive Update
  • 2026 Winter Cover Crops
  • 2026 – Food Quality Maize
  • Soil Health for Profit – James Hunter
  • Soil Health for Profit – Charlie White
  • Soil Health for Profit – Josh Wing
  • Soil Health for Profit – Pranoy Pal
  • Soil Health for Profit – Olivia Webster
  • Soil Health for Profit – Dan Bloomer
  • Soil Health for Profit – John Evans
  • Soil Health for Profit – Bill Ritchie

RECENT POSTS

  • Electrify Hawke’s Bay EXPO
  • Carbon Positive Update
  • 2026 Winter Cover Crops
  • 2026 – Food Quality Maize
  • Soil Health for Profit – James Hunter

CATEGORIES

  • Agritech
  • Arable crops
  • Asparagus
  • Conference
  • Courses
  • Cover crops
  • Crop protection
  • Cultivation
  • Events
  • Fresh Vegetables
  • Irrigation
  • Membership
  • Nitrate
  • Nutrition
  • People
  • Permanent crops
  • Pests
  • Process Crops
  • Projects
  • Protected cropping
  • regenerative agriculture
  • Regulations
  • Research
  • soil health
  • Sustainable technology
  • Uncategorized
  • Water resources
  • Weeds
©2023 LandWISE – Promoting sustainable land management

Disclaimer: Any information on the LandWISE website or linked LandWISE resources is of a general nature only. We endeavour to provide accurate and adequate information relating to the subject matters contained in it. It has been prepared and made available to all persons and entities strictly on the basis that LandWISE, its researchers and authors are fully excluded from any liability for damages arising out of any reliance in part or in full upon any of the information for any purpose. No endorsement of named products is intended nor is any criticism of other alternative, but unnamed product.